Managing ASIL D functional safety for eDrive programs at scale
Client & context
GKN Automotive supplies electric all-wheel-drive and eDrive systems to German OEMs. Electrified drivelines sit at the highest end of the automotive risk scale: unintended torque is an ASIL D hazard.
The problem
eDrive programmes for German OEMs had to be managed to ASIL D — the highest integrity level ISO 26262 defines — while coordinating suppliers and governing a phased path from proving ground to public road. A gap anywhere in the safety argument would block OEM release.
What I did
- Led functional safety management up to ASIL D for AWD/eDrive engineering teams, including supplier safety coordination and technical analysis of hazardous events, with verification aligned to project milestones.
- Defined, implemented, and verified Technical Safety Requirements and Technical Safety Concepts, and designed system- and software-level safety mechanisms (AURIX TC23x internal HW mechanisms, voltage monitoring, ELMOS driver monitoring, start-up MCU test, SafePath testing).
- Analysed third-party safety manuals (AURIX TC23x, TLF35584, Vector OS, AURIX SafeTlib) and performed AURIX FMEDA to recalculate SPFM/LFM from FIT rates.
- Created a progressive safety checklist keyed to the Usage Restriction Level (trained driver, proving ground, public-road deployment), ensuring every safety mechanism was validated before each release.
- Guaranteed testing, timing, A-SPICE, and ISO 26262 compliance across the programme.
The outcome
ASIL D eDrive programmes delivered to German OEM standards, with verified safety mechanisms, FMEDA-backed SPFM/LFM metrics, and a release-governance model that tied every deployment step to validated safety evidence.
Standards & tools
ISO 26262ASIL DAURIX TC23xFMEDA / SPFM / LFMA-SPICETLF35584
Facing something similar?
This is the kind of work I do under Functional Safety Manager.
Book an intro call